Performance Review Process
MS-HR uses a continuous feedback model with formal review checkpoints to support employee development and align individual performance with company goals.
Review Cycle
Jan ── Goal Setting (full year + H1 goals)
Jun ── Mid-Year Review (H1 assessment + H2 goal refinement)
Dec ── Year-End Review (full year assessment + compensation discussion)
Informal 1:1s between manager and employee: minimum monthly.
Goal Framework
All goals are set using the SMART model:
| Criterion | Description |
|---|---|
| Specific | Clear and well-defined |
| Measurable | Quantifiable success metric |
| Achievable | Realistic given resources |
| Relevant | Aligned with company/team OKRs |
| Time-bound | Has a clear deadline |
Recommended split: 70% role-specific goals, 30% personal development goals.
Rating Scale
| Rating | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Exceptional | Consistently exceeds all expectations |
| 4 | Exceeds | Regularly delivers above expectations |
| 3 | Meets | Fully meets expectations |
| 2 | Developing | Partially meets; improvement plan required |
| 1 | Below | Does not meet core expectations |
warning
A rating of 2 or below requires a documented Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) within 2 weeks of the review.
Compensation Review
Compensation adjustments are tied to the year-end review:
- Rating 5: Up to +10% base salary adjustment
- Rating 4: Up to +5% base salary adjustment
- Rating 3: Inflation adjustment (if budget allows)
- Rating ≤ 2: No adjustment; PIP required
All compensation decisions require approval from the Managing Director.